[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions
From: |
Matthew Currie |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:49:00 +0000 |
Thanks anton/martin, this is exactly what I was expecting to hear. There must
be another explanation for my current problem. I will tinker further.
-matt
--
Matthew Currie
Mobile: 250-755-6998
Sent from a BlackBerry device
-----Original Message-----
From: Pascal Brisset <address@hidden>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:15:57
To:address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions
Matthew Currie wrote:
> Quick question about the airframe file. I configured my radio
> properly and can easily switch the manual/auto1/auto2 modes. The
> servos appear to be driving hard in one direction (the same) and
> binding hard so I need to shut it down quick. Let it be noted I do
> not have IR sensors plugged in but I did not figure it would matter
> for manual mode (does it?).
Infrared information is not used in MANUAL mode. So it is the mode you
want to use to test the servos.
> What I want to double check is the servo section of the XML file. Is
> the order important here? What does the no="N" argument mean?
No the order is not meaningful. As answered by Anton, only the "no"
attribute is used. no 0 corresponds to plug S0 on the board.
--Pascal
> After I nail this I should be flight worthy. Thanks for all the
> help to this point.
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthew Currie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel