[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Paparazzi-devel] Wireless communications
From: |
Filipe Varela |
Subject: |
[Paparazzi-devel] Wireless communications |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:47:56 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey
I'm developing a project for long range wireless communications for
both telemetry+video downlink and simmultaneous control uplink.
The idea is not to have an a/v transmitter + r/f receiver on the
platform and r/f transmitter + a/v receiver on the ground but to
merge these two "streams" together on a single long-range radio link.
Now, has anyone experimented with radio-modems? My only doubt is
whether it is feasable to multiplex a telemetry packet plus a video
packet and transmit it to the ground and at the same time demux a
control packet from the ground and still maintain real-time video.
If course that multiplexing control, telemetry and video on a single
channel requires transferring the pwm generation from an r/f
"joystick" to the computer which is an idea i like a lot.
I guess there is a pretty good alternative. Your standard
unidirectional transmission of video+telemetry(audio channel) and use
a cheap gsm module for emergency backup link to control the platform
or override waypoints, maybe force a system shutdown, whatever.
Basically my interest is achieving a specification for VERY CHEAP
long-range bidirectional communications using a single link instead
of r/f + a/v.
BTW, by long range i mean 1Km to 10Km. Any more than that is not of
any interest and should be addressed with propper expensive
transmitters.
To the paparazzi developer: what's your tried and tested max range
for both telemetry/video transmission (air-to-ground) and control
transmission (ground-to-air)?
Thanks for reading,
Filipe
BTW To those looking for a cheap IMU, check this out:
http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?
shop=1&cart=281909&cat=1&itemid=406&
It's a 6DoF for $399 ($339 no bluetooth) ASSEMBLED. Does not filter,
but that should be done by the flight controller anyway. It's still
expensive but a lot cheaper than rotomotions, cloudcap's, etc plus it
IS asssembled with Analog Devices mems gyros and accelerometers which
are, by the way, a real pain-in-the-ass to solder manually (i'd say
impossible but i saw someone do it on a website)...
Plus there's another cool thing. It's modular. You can order the
carrier with either 1, 2 or 3 imu sensor boards (exactly the same).
That way you can test it as you buy it and not pay $339 in a single
payment. cool...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCoelTmNDrBPoaAZcRAkowAJ93fMPNzwKzkJQhz8D4g7BXR98FnACfeyfu
SWjoD1L3LGXrp9PoAkjJY/0=
=pJwy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Paparazzi-devel] Wireless communications,
Filipe Varela <=