[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Paparazzi-devel] Inertial navigation theory
From: |
Filipe Varela |
Subject: |
[Paparazzi-devel] Inertial navigation theory |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:21:14 +0100 (WEST) |
Hi all
I'm new to this list to please bear with me if im saying something stupid
but: is kalman filtering really necessary when using inertial sensors?
An accelerometer's y (pitch) output is pretty accurate when the platform
is idle (ie not moving) right? But this signal is subject to interference
when the platform moves in a direction that is perpendicular to that of
the measurement axis. Picture a little air bubble inside a mini water
container. If you push it straight ahead, the bubble moves back like it
would move front if you applied it a positive (front up) pitch. Inertial
reaction. So, you could determine the ammount of interference caused by
the linear movement and you could even determine it's instant acceleration
and add (positive pitch) or subtract(negative pitch) that to the sensor's
output value and then use simple trig to determine an angle...
Is this nonsense? Is it that difficult to determine the inertial force
(then displacement, then speed, then acceleration) that the linear
movement causes on the accelerometer? Unless this is what kalman filtering
is all about which im not sure it is. (im a newbie to this)
If im right, you could do the same process on the x axis (roll). Then with
a little effort and a single z axis gyro you could apply a precise
correction of both y and x outputs. This would require a 30 euro dual axis
mems accelerometer and a 45 euro z axis mems gyro.
I'm looking forward to getting some feedback from you guys...
Thanks for reading,
Filipe
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Paparazzi-devel] Inertial navigation theory,
Filipe Varela <=