|
From: | Heinrich Müller |
Subject: | Re: [Pan-devel] License issue with optional TLS component (bug 693272) |
Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:01:29 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Am 09.02.2013 23:36, schrieb Petr Kovar:
Hi all, I was wondering what is others' take on Pan bug 693272? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693272 It indeed looks like we can't feature linking to a LGPLv3 library (gnutls2/3) due to the license incompatibility, which is very unfortunate. Getting permission from all code contributors to relicense the code to "GPLv2 or later" doesn't seem to be very realistic either.
This sucks.I frankly didn't notice before, but perhaps we could license pan under LGPL3?
I'm not familiar with the legal mumbo-jumno involved in this. Could you ask Charles / are you familiar with this ? Cheers.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |