[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows patches for the next release
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows patches for the next release |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:59:24 +0300 |
> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:37:36 -0400
>
> On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 19:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Btw, Paul: I see that the sources don't consistently use STOP_SET
> > where characters are tested for being directory separators; sometimes
> > they actually test for both slashes and backslashes. Should we fix
> > that throughout the sources?
>
> STOP_SET() is basically a performance improvement. It would be fine to
> use it in more places, but I don't want to change things at this point
> unless we are very confident they won't introduce any brown paper bag
> bugs for the 4.0 release :-). So if you're confident, go ahead.
>
> Otherwise we can wait for a followup release.
I'm confident, but it's not important enough to have even a small
risk at this point.
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/01
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/01
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/01
- Re: Windows patches for the next release,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Denis Excoffier, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Denis Excoffier, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/05
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/05
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/06
Re: Windows patches for the next release, Christopher Faylor, 2013/10/03