[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows patches for the next release
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Windows patches for the next release |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:37:36 -0400 |
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 19:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Btw, Paul: I see that the sources don't consistently use STOP_SET
> where characters are tested for being directory separators; sometimes
> they actually test for both slashes and backslashes. Should we fix
> that throughout the sources?
STOP_SET() is basically a performance improvement. It would be fine to
use it in more places, but I don't want to change things at this point
unless we are very confident they won't introduce any brown paper bag
bugs for the 4.0 release :-). So if you're confident, go ahead.
Otherwise we can wait for a followup release.
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/01
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/01
- Re: Windows patches for the next release,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Denis Excoffier, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Denis Excoffier, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/02
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/05
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/10/05
- Re: Windows patches for the next release, Paul Smith, 2013/10/06
Re: Windows patches for the next release, Christopher Faylor, 2013/10/03