[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New make PATH problem(?)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New make PATH problem(?) |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:25:13 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:16:06 -0400
> From: "Chris Sutcliffe" <address@hidden>
>
> Sending to the list sorry for the direct email Eli...
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > > So the reason for this problem could only be the way the Make binary
> > > was built, perhaps the libraries it was linked against or something.
> >
> > FWIW, the binary on the MinGW site I created with the following:
> >
> > ../make-3.81-patched/configure \
> > --disable-dependency-tracking \
> > --disable-nls \
> > --enable-case-insensitive-file-system \
> > --disable-job-server \
> > --disable-rpath \
> > --program-prefix=mingw32- \
> > --target=mingw32 \
> > --prefix=/mingw
> > make CFLAGS="-s -O2 -mms-bitfields -mtune=i686"
> > for i in `find . -type f -iname dir`; do rm $i; done
> > make SHELL=/bin/sh.exe prefix=`cd ../dist;pwd` install
> >
> > from an MSYS shell. Is there something in here (perhaps a configure
> > option) that I should not have used (or is there one I should use)?
Don't see anything wrong here, but then I always build Make by using
the supplied build_w32.bat batch file and config.h.W32, not by running
the configure script.
Also, what is the version of MinGW headers and libraries you have
installed? I use the latest official releases: 3.14 for MinGW
runtime, 3.11 for w32api. (I also used the older version 3.7 before
that, and the binary worked with it as well.)
- New make PATH problem(?), robert . h . fletcher, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Chris Sutcliffe, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: Re: New make PATH problem(?), robert . h . fletcher, 2008/04/13
- Re: Re: New make PATH problem(?), Chris Sutcliffe, 2008/04/16
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/17
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Bob Fletcher, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12