[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New make PATH problem(?)
From: |
Chris Sutcliffe |
Subject: |
Re: New make PATH problem(?) |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:16:06 -0400 |
Sending to the list sorry for the direct email Eli...
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > So the reason for this problem could only be the way the Make binary
> > was built, perhaps the libraries it was linked against or something.
>
> FWIW, the binary on the MinGW site I created with the following:
>
> ../make-3.81-patched/configure \
> --disable-dependency-tracking \
> --disable-nls \
> --enable-case-insensitive-file-system \
> --disable-job-server \
> --disable-rpath \
> --program-prefix=mingw32- \
> --target=mingw32 \
> --prefix=/mingw
> make CFLAGS="-s -O2 -mms-bitfields -mtune=i686"
> for i in `find . -type f -iname dir`; do rm $i; done
> make SHELL=/bin/sh.exe prefix=`cd ../dist;pwd` install
>
> from an MSYS shell. Is there something in here (perhaps a configure
> option) that I should not have used (or is there one I should use)?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Sutcliffe
> http://emergedesktop.org
>
--
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
- New make PATH problem(?), robert . h . fletcher, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Message not available
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Chris Sutcliffe, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12
- Re: Re: New make PATH problem(?), robert . h . fletcher, 2008/04/13
- Re: Re: New make PATH problem(?), Chris Sutcliffe, 2008/04/16
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/17
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Bob Fletcher, 2008/04/12
- Re: New make PATH problem(?), Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/12