[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:06:42 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:45:47 +0100 (BST)
> From: Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden>
> cc: Alex Riesen <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> The problem is that on Windows, you cannot keep a file open and delete it
> at the same time.
That is no longer true, for quite some time. NT4 and later versions
support that almost exactly like Posix filesystems.
> > > - no acceptable level of performance in filesystem and VFS (readdir,
> > > stat, open and read/write are annoyingly slow)
> >
> > With what libraries? Native `stat' and `readdir' are quite fast.
> > Perhaps you mean the ported glibc (libgw32c), where `readdir' is indeed
> > painfully slow, but then you don't need to use it.
>
> No, native.
>
> Once you experienced the performance of git on Linux, then rebooted into
> Windows on the same box, you will grow a beard while waiting for trivial
> operations.
Maybe GIT assumes too much about `readdir' and `stat', and should
refactor its code into better abstractions.
> > > - it is the only OS in the world with multi-root (/a/b/c and /a/b/c
> > > can be not the same, depending on what current "drive" is)
> >
> > So what? on Unix "a/b/c" can be not the same. Both cases are simply not
> > complete file names, that's all. No one said there must be a single
> > root for all volumes, it's the Posix jingoism creeping in again.
>
> I think Alex means this: you can have C:\a\b\c and D:\a\b\c. So depending
> on which drive you are, you mean one or the other. Just comparing the
> paths is not enough.
What _I_ meant is that the C: part is part of the full file name,
exactly like the leading / is on Unix.
> > > - No real "mmap" (which kills perfomance and complicates code)
> >
> > You only need mmap because you are accustomed to use it on GNU/Linux.
>
> Yes. And we rely on the performance very much.
There's no need for mmap to get memory performance, except if sbrk and
friends are too slow.
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, (continued)
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Steffen Prohaska, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Johannes Schindelin, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Alex Riesen, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Brian Dessent, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Earnie Boyd, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Earnie Boyd, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Johannes Schindelin, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, David Kastrup, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Alex Riesen, 2007/10/15
- RE: Switching from CVS to GIT, Dave Korn, 2007/10/15
- RE: Switching from CVS to GIT, Johannes Schindelin, 2007/10/15
- Re: Switching from CVS to GIT, Alex Riesen, 2007/10/15