[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug with 3.81?
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug with 3.81? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:08:24 -0400 |
On Friday, 27 October, Eli Zaretskii (address@hidden) wrote:
> Paul, is this expected? It seems reasonable to me, but perhaps it
> should be mentioned in the manual.
No, I think this is a bug. Make should choose the first pattern rule to
build lib%.a, because both patterns can be built.
Chris, can you please file a bug in Savannah about this? Don't forget to
include a minimal makefile.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Possible bug with 3.81?, Chris Sutcliffe, 2006/10/25
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/25
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Earnie Boyd, 2006/10/26
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Chris Sutcliffe, 2006/10/26
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Chris Sutcliffe, 2006/10/26
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/27
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?,
Paul D. Smith <=
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/28
- Re: Possible bug with 3.81?, Paul D. Smith, 2006/10/28