[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunte
From: |
Christopher Faylor |
Subject: |
Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)] |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:28:31PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor <address@hidden>
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <address@hidden> -----
>>
>> From: Angelo Graziosi <Angelo.Graziosi-AT-roma1-DOT-infn-DOT-it>
>> To: cygwin
>> Subject: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch
>> for gnu make)
>> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:35:52 +0200 (MET DST)
>> [...]
>> Using the official version in Cygwin of make (make-3.81-1) the build
>> is completed without problem:
>
>I need some clarifications about the two versions of Make that are
>involved in this problem:
>
>Chris, your announcement about make-3.81-1 says you used the latest
>Fedora Red Hat distribution, and the ChangeLog cites a couple of
>patches applied by Red Hat to the official Make sources. Where can I
>see those patches?
The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~". Diffing those
with their non-.foo~ counterparts shows the differences.
cgf
Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)], Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/02
Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)],
Christopher Faylor <=
Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)], Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/02