[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32 |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 13:56:47 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
On 2006-5-19 13:44 UTC, Leeuwesteijn,Joost wrote:
>>From: Greg Chicares [mailto:address@hidden
>
>>You can use Cygwin or MSYS to build native applications. I've used
>>MSYS to build gnu make-3.81 and gnu sed-4.0.7 from unmodified FSF
>>sources, for example. As you say, these native builds probably
>>perform better than other builds that require an emulation dll,
>>and not having to modify sources is a very good thing.
>
> I thought CygWin (and MSYS too, without MinGW? Does MSYS have gcc?) created
> NON-native (== DLL dependent) executables?
You can build native binaries, that don't depend on any posix-
emulation dll, with either Cygwin or MSYS and MinGW. With MSYS
and MinGW, you get native binaries by default; to produce a
dll-dependent binary, you need to download and use a separate
package.
> Does MSYS have gcc?)
Instead of trying to reinvent the FAQs, poorly, let me just
cite them:
http://mingw.org/mingwfaq.shtml
http://mingw.org/MinGWiki
http://cygwin.com/faq.html
- UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32, Leeuwesteijn,Joost, 2006/05/19
- RE: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32, Leeuwesteijn,Joost, 2006/05/19
- RE: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32, Leeuwesteijn,Joost, 2006/05/19
- RE: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32, Leeuwesteijn,Joost, 2006/05/19
- Re: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32,
Greg Chicares <=
- RE: UnxUtils, Unix tools on Win32, Leeuwesteijn,Joost, 2006/05/19