[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make/tests issues
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: make/tests issues |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Mar 2004 13:42:43 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:35:42 -0500
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>
> %% "J. Grant" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> jg> Ok, I think running something like:
>
> jg> "tr -d \r <comments.log >normalised_comments.log"
>
> jg> on each output file would mean the diff comparisons would be able
> jg> to use the normal LF format files included in the distribution.
> jg> Could something like this be added?
>
> Well, that's not very portable. It obviously won't work on Windows
> ports without any sort of UNIX emulation, at the very least.
Why is there a need for this? The Make test suite calls "diff -c" to
compare the expected output with the actual one; a well-ported Diff
will compare two files which are identical except for the Unix- vs
Wndows-style end-of-line format issue as being identical. Why doesn't
it happen in the OP's case?
- Re: make/tests issues, J. Grant, 2004/03/06
- Re: make/tests issues, Paul D. Smith, 2004/03/06
- Re: make/tests issues,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: make/tests issues, J. Grant, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, J. Grant, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Paul D. Smith, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, J. Grant, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Paul D. Smith, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/10
- Re: make/tests issues, Earnie Boyd, 2004/03/11