[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32.
From: |
Soren A |
Subject: |
Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32. |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:16:54 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Xnews/4.06.22 |
"Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> wrote in
news:address@hidden:
> For bcopy etc., the configure script checks that these exist and, if
> not, redefines them using ISO C functions (see make.h).
I don't require a reply, Paul, -- I don't want to seem lazy and the
proper non-lazy thing for me to do (which for reasons other than sheer
laziness I am inhibited from doing in my present setup right now, for a
little longer) would be to check out the CVS sources and check
change-logs myself.
But: as of make-3.80rc1, this wasn't true: checking for bcopy() wasn't
happening. Nor for memmove(). I posted about that in another message
tonight and so I am mentioning it here (I read the other message and
replied before finding and reading this thread). So if make's source
build-configuration IS checking for bcopy() now, it's a recent addition?
Best,
Soren A
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Earnie Boyd, 2002/09/08
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32.,
Soren A <=
- RE: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., John Cronin, 2002/09/10
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Earnie Boyd, 2002/09/10
- RE: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., John Cronin, 2002/09/10
- RE: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., John Cronin, 2002/09/10
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Paul G., 2002/09/10
- RE: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Paul D. Smith, 2002/09/10
- Re: Make configuration for Win32., Soren A, 2002/09/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Paul D. Smith, 2002/09/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Make configuration for Win32., Soren A, 2002/09/25