lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx and webmail interfaces?


From: Jude DaShiell
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx and webmail interfaces?
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:57:11 -0500

Either way, that's a bad deal.


-- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Actually, that is untrue.
> Shellworld owners are intent on deciding what  email we can and cannot see,
> including items an individual may consider spam but they do not, and clearly
> the other way around as well.
> There is a difference.
> its not that we get lots of spam. Instead we end up not getting email  the
> individual knows should get through, with  a third party making the decision.
> As an example, my bank cannot reach me at all now.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > Maybe others can help here, users can install their own copy of
> > spamassassin though that needs some work to do it correctly.  Another
> > possibility may be procmail and that needs some study to set recipes up
> > correctly.
> > It seems to me shellworld.net is intent on keeping its users open to spam.
> >
> >
> > -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
> > defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
> > order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >
> >> Have you a trash folder or junkmail folder?
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
> >> defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
> >> order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Agree about spam assassin.
> >>> However the owners of shellworld disliked the program, so instead of
> >>> individual  choice for users, they took the choice away from everyone.
> >>> did try to use my password at gmail, likely the code got filtered as
> >>> spam..for
> >>> which I have no folder.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> panix.com has both roundcube and squirrelmail but we found both of those
> >>>> interfaces are inaccessible for command line users of linux so although I
> >>>> could set them up I couldn't access them effectively.  That's why I am
> >>>> using spamassassin.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com>
> >>>> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >>>> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo.
> >>>> Please use in that order."
> >>>> Ed Howdershelt 1940.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>> As some may know google is force feeding the removal of access for basic
> >>>>> html.
> >>>>> For me personally this presents several issues, shellworld is amazing in
> >>>>> general, but the owners have removed the right to review spam here all
> >>>>> together.
> >>>>> There is a thread over at DOS ain't dead about providers who  still have
> >>>>> web
> >>>>> interfaces, using roundcube or squirrel mail, someone even spoke of
> >>>>> fastmail.
> >>>>> Anyone know of  either an email service that incorporates these lower
> >>>>> graphics
> >>>>> interfaces, or host mail  in a way that allows  full detailed inbox
> >>>>> access
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> a reliable way.
> >>>>> Even Links with its JavaScript touches, and elinks when compiled for
> >>>>> JavaScript might be an option, but asking about Lynx in case I have
> >>>>> missed
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> door.
> >>>>> Am a bit shaky here, lots of please fit into our disability box, or
> >>>>> there
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> no place for our freakishness stuff in my life lately.
> >>>>> I do not want to chance a gmail login, until i know where I am
> >>>>> going..shellworld is my alternative address for gmail, and with no spam
> >>>>> folder
> >>>>> I might miss the two factor  code option.
> >>>>> Lynx ideas for email?
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Karen
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]