Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx and webmail interfaces?

[Karen Lewellen]

Actually, that is untrue.
Shellworld owners are intent on deciding what  email we can and cannot 
see,  including items an individual may consider spam but they do not, and 
clearly the other way around as well.
There is a difference.
its not that we get lots of spam. Instead we end up not getting email  the 
individual knows should get through, with  a third party making the 
decision.
As an example, my bank cannot reach me at all now.



On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> Maybe others can help here, users can install their own copy of
> spamassassin though that needs some work to do it correctly.  Another
> possibility may be procmail and that needs some study to set recipes up
> correctly.
> It seems to me shellworld.net is intent on keeping its users open to spam.
>
>
> -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
> defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
> order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > Have you a trash folder or junkmail folder?
> >
> >
> > -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
> > defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
> > order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >
> > > Agree about spam assassin.
> > > However the owners of shellworld disliked the program, so instead of
> > > individual  choice for users, they took the choice away from everyone.
> > > did try to use my password at gmail, likely the code got filtered as spam..for
> > > which I have no folder.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > >
> > > > panix.com has both roundcube and squirrelmail but we found both of those
> > > > interfaces are inaccessible for command line users of linux so although I
> > > > could set them up I couldn't access them effectively.  That's why I am
> > > > using spamassassin.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com>
> > > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> > > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo.
> > > > Please use in that order."
> > > > Ed Howdershelt 1940.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > As some may know google is force feeding the removal of access for basic
> > > > > html.
> > > > > For me personally this presents several issues, shellworld is amazing in
> > > > > general, but the owners have removed the right to review spam here all
> > > > > together.
> > > > > There is a thread over at DOS ain't dead about providers who  still have
> > > > > web
> > > > > interfaces, using roundcube or squirrel mail, someone even spoke of
> > > > > fastmail.
> > > > > Anyone know of  either an email service that incorporates these lower
> > > > > graphics
> > > > > interfaces, or host mail  in a way that allows  full detailed inbox access
> > > > > in
> > > > > a reliable way.
> > > > > Even Links with its JavaScript touches, and elinks when compiled for
> > > > > JavaScript might be an option, but asking about Lynx in case I have missed
> > > > > a
> > > > > door.
> > > > > Am a bit shaky here, lots of please fit into our disability box, or there
> > > > > is
> > > > > no place for our freakishness stuff in my life lately.
> > > > > I do not want to chance a gmail login, until i know where I am
> > > > > going..shellworld is my alternative address for gmail, and with no spam
> > > > > folder
> > > > > I might miss the two factor  code option.
> > > > > Lynx ideas for email?
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Karen