[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx and duckduckgo
From: |
Stefan Caunter |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx and duckduckgo |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:33:16 -0400 |
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Jude DaShiell <address@hidden> wrote:
> It works better than google. No invalid cookie prompt with every search.
> One thing has me puzzled though about lynx. Why put questions in the
> options section where values cannot be changed by users? This invalid
> cookies question has an (!) mark on its line. If a user can adjust this
> with a command line option that's reasonable otherwise doesn't it make
> more sense to keep all of that configuration in /etc/lynx.cfg?
in lynx.cfg there is a setting to enable user changes to those
settings, and the Options page will save them for the lynx user
look for lines like this, uncomment and set to "ON"
#ENABLE_LYNXRC:SEND_USERAGENT:OFF