[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7
From: |
Axel Beckert |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7 |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:17:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:51:52AM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Thomas Dickey dixit:
> > yes... but the registry which periodically asks for verification seems to
> > care :-)
Then revoke that single uid from that key. There's a second uid with
the same e-mail address as your other key. Then also the registry
should not argue about this anymore.
> What registry?
See the recurring signatures by "PGP Global Directory Verification
Key".
> Besides, this is all just about making recipients clear that the
> old key “endorses” the new key, so it’s really a key signature,
> not a uid signature, though PGP only knows the latter. It’s meant
> for human beings such as XTaran.
^^^^^^
JFYI: Thorsten referred to me with that. It's my IRC nick, which I
usually don't use in e-mail or in real-life.
Kind regards, Axel
--
/~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert
\ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | address@hidden (Mail)
X See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | address@hidden (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)
- [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/18
- [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/18
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/19
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Axel Beckert, 2015/12/20
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/20
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/20
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thorsten Glaser, 2015/12/20
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/20
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thorsten Glaser, 2015/12/21
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7,
Axel Beckert <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7, Thomas Dickey, 2015/12/21