[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs".
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs". |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 23:57:30 +0000 (UTC) |
Thomas Dickey dixit:
>If it's compiled-in, then NSL_FORK will show up in the "lynxcompileopts:"
>special page.
This shows
NSL_FORK 1
for me. IIRC, enabling this solved a similar problem back in
the days, but not all of it.
bye,
//mirabilos
PS: FreeBSD is not representative for BSD.
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs
- [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., \"Chad Kline\", 2014/04/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thomas Dickey, 2014/04/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thorsten Glaser, 2014/04/07
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thomas Dickey, 2014/04/07
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thorsten Glaser, 2014/04/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Ian Collier, 2014/04/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thomas Dickey, 2014/04/09
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs".,
Thorsten Glaser <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2 Lynx "Bugs"., Thomas Dickey, 2014/04/09