[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10 |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:01:37 +0000 (UTC) |
Thomas Dickey dixit:
>> HTTP/1.0 200 OKlynx in free(): error: chunk is already free
>> Abort (core dumped)
>
> Is this for a URL that I could test (and reproduce)?
No, it occurs after running lynx for a while, but it didn't
occur when running lynx out of gdb (yet).
> That might help. Generally I'm using valgrind (instead).
Okay, I'll look at it. But I don't know if it's a memory
management related thing, because the termination is
started by propolice[1], not our malloc implementation.
I'm still puzzled, because diffing between dev.7b and 10
shows only one more free()...
bye,
//mirabile
[1] http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/
- [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/02
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10,
Thorsten Glaser <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- weird abortions (was Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10), Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: weird abortions (was Re: [Lynx-dev] 2.8.6dev.10), Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/03
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: weird abortions, Thorsten Glaser, 2005/01/03