Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)))

[Frédéric L . W . Meunier]

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Henry Nelson wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:38:12PM -0200, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > (My own view is that non-subscribers shouldn't be allowed to
> > > post, but the last time we argued this I was in the [very
> > > small] minority.)
> >
> > Why ? I'll moderate it. But I don't like the idea of moderating
> > what goes to the actual lynx-dev, so better get rid of it and
> > do "2" -
> [...]
> > "2- Send back a message about the move. Their original message
> > could be included, just in case they don't save a copy."
>
> Since you are the one doing it; whatever you setup is fine [by me anyway].
>
> I didn't understand what you meant by "actual lynx-dev".  Did you mean
> the "present lynx-dev" list, i.e., what we are using now at sig.net?

Yes.

> Or will you be employing some kind of secondary, filtered
> list which is open to anyone that you monitor, in addition to
> the "actual" lynx-dev list which is not monitored, but
> automatically filtered and closed to subscribers only?

The actual, present, current, or whatever lynx-dev will be
closed once we move it.

-- 
http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden