[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list prob
From: |
Frédéric L . W . Meunier |
Subject: |
lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))) |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:44:43 -0200 (BRST) |
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, SP-BEI wrote:
> I'll go with whatever the Lynx community wants to do. If the
> decision is to move the list elsewhere, I'll offer what help
> that I can in keeping the address@hidden alive for as long
> as possible. Of course the list is just part of the support
> issue here. Maintaining the list and source archives might
> also be a goal. I was waiting for someone to step up for
> that after the non-Gnu project page was created.
So, do we have an agreement ? And maybe you Bob can be the
third administrator / moderator ?
I can't do anything without you.
What I proposed:
1- Move it to Savannah.
2- Create a lynx-dev there.
3- Create a lynx-announce there. Thomas sends announcements
about new releases (and /temp patches) to both.
4- Subscribe all users from the old lynx-dev to the new and
send them a message about the move. They have to reply to it /
follow the instructions to get subscribed.
Yes, we could just add the 140+ automatically, but we don't
know how many are still "valid".
Or we can. Opinions ?
5- Contact the lynx-dev-contrib subscribers and ask if they
want to be added in a list of addresses that can only post.
6- If someone tries to subscribe to the old lynx-dev and
lynx-dev-contrib, send them a message about the move.
The same could be made for messages from non subscribers. But
then you'd probably send hundreds of e-mails back to spammers.
7- Remove the spam from the FLORA.org archives. I already did
it for 2000-January 2004 (thanks to Pine), and really don't
think there was any before it. Well, there was one in December
1999, but that's probably all. A spam (probably from a
subscriber) in thousands of messages isn't that bad. 90% or
more was.
The move can't be done by us. We'd have to contact the Savannah
people (and persuade them ?).
8- Once we're done we can ask FLORA.org to redirect everything
under http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/ to the main page of the
new archives.
--
http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), (continued)
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), SP-BEI, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))),
Frédéric L . W . Meunier <=
- Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/07
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thorsten Glaser, 2004/02/05
- Re: lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), David Woolley, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/22
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/22