[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 May 2000 13:25:23 -0400 |
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 04:12:51PM +0000, Duncan Simpson wrote:
>
> xpdf is a nice front end to ghosscript that works IMHO much better than
> acrobat reader (less bloat, does not just dump core and source code
> included).
> AFAIK it requires ghsoscrip or some other postscript rendering engine with
> X!1
> output support. xdf seems to work where plain ghostscript has considerable
> problems and I can recommendd it.
It's fine when it works - but it doesn't always render readably
(even for text-only). So I use both.
(I wouldn't recommend ghostscript for pdf documents either)
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Christian Weisgerber, 2000/05/27
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24