[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
From: |
Atsuhito Kohda |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2000 14:16:48 +0900 |
From: Henry Nelson <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 20:32:55 +0900 (JST)
> We all used them, from Lynx2.3, more than 5 years ago. For you to tell
> me that Lynx is/was not one of the forerunners of CJK support is a total
> mind blower.
Sorry but who said such that Lynx is/was not one of the
forerunners of CJK support?
If I think so I do not maintain a wrapper style package.
I only requested that please merge some feature of a wrapper
into source code if possible.
Regards, 2000.5.25
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <address@hidden>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/23
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/23
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, pAb-032871, 2000/05/24
- lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG), Michael Warner, 2000/05/26