[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LYNX-DEV filter policies
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
LYNX-DEV filter policies |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 1997 16:30:33 -0400 (EDT) |
to follow up on what Jonathan Sergent said:
> Al asks:
> ] Other topics where I could use a tutorial: compare and contrast
> ] the filtering capability native to MajorDomo with the capability
> ] of Procmail recipes. (what you can do -- user perspective).
>
> Majordomo will let you match various patterns in headers or body to
> flag messages to be forwarded to the approval addres.
>
> Said patterns are perl regular expressions, quite flexible.
>
[I read a little about it.] Curiously enough, this means that
Procmail can implement the rule I suggested and MajorDomo can't
(without touching the Perl). Or at least I don't understand how
one could emulate a GO-pattern by a STOP-pattern. Only being
able to define taboo patterns is IMHO much less capable than a
slalom of STOP and GO conditions. Sigh.
--
Al
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Philip Webb, 1997/07/14
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Al Gilman, 1997/07/14
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Klaus Weide, 1997/07/14
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/07/14
- Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Al Gilman, 1997/07/14
- LYNX-DEV filter policies,
Al Gilman <=
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Jim Dennis, 1997/07/14
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Jim Dennis, 1997/07/14
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/07/14
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/07/14
Re: LYNX-DEV lynx-dev list status/problems, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/07/14