[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [bug #63306] Is it possible that pcb->lastack is greater th
From: |
jiangheng |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [bug #63306] Is it possible that pcb->lastack is greater than seg->tcphdr->seqno? |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:35:16 -0400 (EDT) |
URL:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?63306>
Summary: Is it possible that pcb->lastack is greater than
seg->tcphdr->seqno?
Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
Submitter: jinag12345
Submitted: Wed 02 Nov 2022 12:35:14 PM UTC
Category: TCP
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: Crash Error
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Planned Release: None
lwIP version: 2.1.3
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 02 Nov 2022 12:35:14 PM UTC By: jiangheng <jinag12345>
in tcp_output function:
https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/core/tcp_out.c#n1309
if the seg is a retransmit segment,The peer client confirms only part of the
data of the segment. The value of pcb->lastack will be greater than that of
seg->tcphdr->seqno. line 1309 will be a bug.
because segment that part of data be confirmed will be retransmited whole
segment.
https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/core/tcp_in.c#n1111
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?63306>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [bug #63306] Is it possible that pcb->lastack is greater than seg->tcphdr->seqno?,
jiangheng <=