[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] PolarSSL -> mbed TLS
From: |
Jonathan Larmour |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] PolarSSL -> mbed TLS |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:42:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hi,
Long time no post (for me)...
On 07/03/16 22:54, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:43:26PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
>> I just wondered: now that PolarSSL has been bought by ARM and the
>> successor, mbed TLS is available under a non-GPL license again
>> (Apache): [snip]
> We can probably allow using ASL in lwIP, it reaches my limit at
> understanding slight differences between licenses, from my opinion
> it's as free as BSD.
According to the FSF, it's not compatible with the GPLv2 [1], only
GPLv3. That is why mbed TLS is dual licensed with GPLv2:
https://tls.mbed.org/how-to-get
Some care would be needed in how it is incorporated into lwIP, or
perhaps, incorporating would be the wrong approach and it should just be
a case of the user linking against an mbed TLS they've built themselves.
Jifl
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine