|
| From: | Simon Goldschmidt |
| Subject: | [lwip-devel] [task #13512] check how IPv6 handles the "no address" case for routing |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:21:37 +0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #7, task #13512 (project lwip):
Is this a matter of RFC conformance? I thought it was just about integrating
our internal netif states (potentially down/no link) into what the RFC says
about routing?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?13512>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |