Re: [lwip-devel] A few issues

[Simon Kallweit]

Simon Kallweit wrote:
> * When using NO_SYS == 1 I get an compiler error because the definition 
> of sys_prot_t is missing. All is fine in NO_SYS == 0 as in this case 
> sys.h includes sys_arch.h which defines sys_prot_t. Shouldn't the 
> sys_arch.h include be moved to the top of sys.h so it gets included for 
> both NO_SYS == 0/1? Or is sys_arch.h only intended to be used in the 
> NO_SYS == 0 case? Where should sys_prot_t then be defined?

Sorry, didn't realize there already exists a bugreport for this. Reading 
up ...