Re: [lwip-devel] Comment about SMEMCPY

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:53 -0500, Bill Auerbach wrote:
> I thought I read somewhere that SMEMCPY was meant for a constant
> length and small length use so that a compiler (or user) could inline
> the call.
> 
> 3 occurrences in socket.c, 1 in tcp_out.c, and 1 in ppp.c don’t meet
> above “rules” because the length isn’t constant.

Hi Bill,

I'm happy to see such things improved.  They may only be minor changes,
but they're still worthy of a bug on savannah to make sure they don't
get forgotten.

Kieran