Re: RE : RE : [lwip-devel] Last changes by Marc

[Jonathan Larmour]

Frédéric BERNON wrote:
> > I had thought you had meant make it only the ETHARP_TCPIP_ETHINPUT option, 
> > rather than make it no option at all. Not everyone uses ethernet, and 
> > there may be other routes for drivers to introduce packets to the system 
> > (e.g. via their own tcpip_callback calls, like PPP does), so it should 
> > still be an option I think. Not least if anyone was using only PPP, not 
> > ethernet.
>
> Ok. So, which option? I think that LWIP_ARP should be enought and avoid to 
> (re-)add something like ETHARP_TCPIP_ETHINPUT or ETHARP_TCPIP_INPUT. Your point 
> of view?

I guess since for now at least LWIP_ARP is specific to ethernet, then yes 
changing the #if ETHARP_TCPIP_ETHINPUT code to be LWIP_ARP would be fine 
for me. And remove the ETHARP_TCPIP_INPUT specific code, as you wanted.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited      http://www.eCosCentric.com/     The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.       Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["The best things in life aren't things."]------      Opinions==mine