[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:28:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4 |
Follow-up Comment #18, task #6930 (project lwip):
> I think that most of time, applications developers with
> netconn layer write (like Magnus said) :
>
> netconn_close(conn);
> netconn_delete(conn);
It's OK if developers do that, but what if there's code in between? I think
either we should completely remove netconn_close or close the connection when
calling the function. Having an empty function is, in my opinion, a real hack!
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6930>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- Re: [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Berglund Magnus, 2007/06/28
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/28
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/28
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/28
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/29
- [lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/30