[lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER

[Frédéric Bernon]

Follow-up Comment #17, task #6930 (project lwip):

>Why an empty netconn_close? What about netconn api software that relies on
that functionality?

I think that most of time, applications developers with netconn layer write
(like Magnus said) :

netconn_close(conn);
netconn_delete(conn); 

So, what is the real use of netcon_close in this case? And I think that's why
the socket layer doesn't call it. So, do all the process in netconn_delete
(which we have to call in all cases) will help to have a good code in all -
current - sequential api layers...


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6930>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/