[lwip-devel] [task #6930] Implement SO_LINGER

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Follow-up Comment #16, task #6930 (project lwip):

Why an empty netconn_close? What about netconn api software that relies on
that functionality? After all, I think it's cleaner to close the connection
in netconn_close and delete it in netconn_delete, like the names say.

Closing/deleting is not performance-sensitive in most applications, anyway,
so it's not that bad to have two functions...

And in a new socket layer, we can do everything in one function ;-)

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6930>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/