[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way
From: |
Frédéric Bernon |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:38:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #20021 (project lwip):
Note that netconn_close is not used at socket layer. But if you use it, you
have to be sure that the tcp_close have success.
If during the close, there is a ERR_MEM, to avoid to consumne cycles to
retry, you wait the next "poll_tcp"...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?20021>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Kieran Mansley, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way,
Frédéric Bernon <=
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Kieran Mansley, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/01
- [lwip-devel] [bug #20021] conn->sem is only signaled one-way, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/06/01