Re: [lwip-devel] more about SO_REUSE and UDP

[christiaan . simons]

address@hidden wrote on 23-03-2004
20:26:40:

Thanks,

> Maybe we should ask on lwip-users?

If we can think up an alternative
for the current implementation it will
both please the socket and PCB users.

Besides simple PCB based applications
we have our own sockets implementation.

We keep the socket options in the socket
layer itself, instead of placing them in the pcb
(so_options in the IP_PCB define in ip.h ?).

I'm not familiar with the lwip socket layer,
but there seems to be a struct where all of the
options could live.

Bye,

Christiaan

The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. Axon Digital Design Group is neither liable for the proper nor
for the complete transmission of the information contained in this
communication nor for any delay in its receipt. Axon Digital Design Group
does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been
maintained nor that the communication is free of viruses, interceptions or
interference. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication,
you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or
copying this message is strictly prohibited. In that case please return the
communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies. In carrying
out its engagements, Axon Digital Design Group applies general terms and
conditions, which contain a clause that limits its liability. A copy of
these terms and conditions is available on request free of charge.