Re: [lwip-devel] (no subject)

[Kaos]

address@hidden wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
>
> > I would suggest using standard C names, with lwip_ prefix, such
> > as malloc() lwip_free(). The memory allocator should then implement
> > those functions.

I like this sugestion.

> Sounds like a great idea to me. Perhaps the memory allocator could be a
> part of the port instead of the main lwIP tree? This would make a lot of
> sense to me. 


> The only problem is how to support both a general purpose and
> pool allocator for those that really want it (anyone?).

I don't quite see the problem, but I'm not a memory guru either. If your 
question is about anyone wants to use a pool allocator - I do, since 
it's alredy in place with the os I use and I prefer a pool version to 
avoid memory fragmentation.

// Andreas

[snip]