[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad grace note spacing
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bad grace note spacing |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 08:01:09 +0000 (UTC) |
>> The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all.
>
> It’s quite related. [...]
With 'related' I meant that there are two separate bugs. I didn't
talk about what the best fix for the whole problem actually is.
> In strict-grace-spacing mode, grace columns are not part of the main
> chain of springs that goes through the whole system from column to
> columns and stretches or compresses. Instead, they are placed
> separately. That’s the easiest way of making the space between a
> grace and its main note non-stretching that I can think of.
Yes. The only problem is what to do if there isn't sufficient space
for the grace note.
> The other way would be add very strong springs to make the
> distances “almost” fixed, but it would be ugly.
What exactly would be ugly?
> To me, the issue is essentially requesting two things: a) make
> strict-grace-spacing less buggy, b) make strict-grace-spacing the
> default.
I agree with both. However, until this gets fixed, I wonder whether
there are work-arounds that could be applied.
Werner
- bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/18