[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad grace note spacing
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bad grace note spacing |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:10:46 +0000 (UTC) |
>> I tried that, but as soon as a group of grace notes has some
>> accidentals it produces bad output.
>
> Doesn't that sound more like the issue should be
> "strict-grace-spacing produces bad output if grace note has
> accidental" rather than "strict-grace-spacing should be the
> default"?
The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all.
That `s-g-s` produces bad results in the presence of accidentals is
another issue – AFAICS, the problematic appearance is already
described in https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/2630 (first
reported in 2008).
Werner
- bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/17
- Re: bad grace note spacing,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/18
- Re: bad grace note spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/18