Re: Documentation: Should we possibly have aliases for current stable and current devel?

[Kevin Cole]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:33 AM Lukas-Fabian Moser <lfm@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> > On the other hand, I strongly favor sticking with a distribution's
> > package rather than starting every day with a "git pull". So, I'm
> > always slightly behind the latest and greatest.
>
> Just for the record: Your description omits the (actually quite
> convenient) middle between the two extremes: Namely, that it's quite
> easy to keep up with current LilyPond development by downloading and
> using the respective (unstable) builds that are released every few weeks
> to months.

The point I was trying to make was "Does there REALLY need to be
documentation for versions 2.13 to 2.25?  Maybe 2.20 to 2.25 would
suffice."