[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: writing score in absolute time
From: |
Jacopo Greco d'Alceo |
Subject: |
Re: writing score in absolute time |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Feb 2023 18:28:11 +0100 |
Thank you Gregory for your complete answer.
And you’ve seen it right. I’m not yet an Abjad user, but I looked at it with
interest - but never drown inside.
I’m just another composer still dreaming about writing music easily with a
computer.
I’ll take a look at what you sent me, but, joining Jean’s argument, i think I
did not have been clear.
Long time ago I started a project for a piece for diskclavier where I wrote a
score on the picture of the spectrogram of the electronic part.
I used, as I said, bach inside max because you can quickly do and export in
.png a proportional notation. I just wrote a value and an absolute time for
each note and the game was done. Obviously bach is really approximative.
An idea of what I would like to transpose in a score is a Csound score:
i.e.:
name note starting
duration midi note
of the staff point in seconds of the
note (or cent wherever..)
i “violin” 0
3s 69
i “violin” .234s
1.4s 50
i “violin” .345s
2.1s 34
i “piano” 0
3s 69
i “violin” 0
3s 54
and generate an A4 or just en image.
Thanks,
j
> On 4 Feb 2023, at 16:12, Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2023 10:26, Jacopo Greco d'Alceo wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I’ve always wondered if it’s possible to write a lilypond score in *absolute
>> time*, just giving almost 2 parameters: note and absolute time in seconds,
>> without the measure boundaries.
>> If yes, can you give some exemple? Maybe with Abjad?
>
>
> I'm sorry, but although it seems to be perfectly clear
> for other people, it is not clear to me what you are looking
> for. Would you mind elaborating?
>
> Are you looking for a different way of producing the same output
> as usual from different input, by entering the absolute position
> in seconds of each note in the score instead of entering a sequence
> of notes whose durations add up -- in which case you may be looking
> for \after or the edition-engraver? Are you looking for producing
> different output from the same input, by making the notation
> proportional -- in which case you should look at proportional notation
> in the manual? Or both? Or something else entirely?
>
- writing score in absolute time, Jacopo Greco d'Alceo, 2023/02/04
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Andrew Bernard, 2023/02/04
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/04
- Re: writing score in absolute time,
Jacopo Greco d'Alceo <=
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Cordelia, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, David Wright, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Cordelia, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Knute Snortum, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Aaron Hill, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/02/07
- Re: writing score in absolute time, Cordelia, 2023/02/07