[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Text font installation
|
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
|
Subject: |
Re: Text font installation |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Mar 2023 13:17:42 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) |
Le jeudi 02 mars 2023 à 02:26 +0100, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> Folks,
> Maybe we should go over all packagers of LilyPond and check that they have
> accounted for the change that made the build system no longer install text
> fonts? Homebrew [got it
> wrong](https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/119476) (and it took
> effort to convince them that this was not a LilyPond bug!), Debian [got it
> wrong](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026200#55) before
> Jonas flagged the problem, and now I have noticed that MacPorts [got it
> wrong](https://trac.macports.org/ticket/67026#ticket) as well.
So, I did some digging and here is what I found:
Fedora and Gentoo seem to get it right.
ArchLinux gets it almost right, however I think that TeX Gyre fonts should be
made required,
[https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/77700](https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/77700).
Manjaro takes the package from ArchLinux.
Debian also made the fonts-texgyre package optional. I've opened
[https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1855](https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1855)
to document that they should be required and posted about this on
[https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026200](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026200)
(should appear soon).
Linux Mint and openSUSE does not package LilyPond. openSUSE has "community
packages" for it but I didn't look at them.
Chocolatey still has LilyPond 2.22, Homebrew was fixed, MacPorts has a bug page.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part