Re: Explicit default duration?

[Aaron Hill]

On 2023-01-23 4:01 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> Aaron Hill <lilypond@hillvisions.com> writes:
> > Out of curiosity, would this work in your proposed syntax?
> >
> > "tamb4 r0 0 8 8" for "tamb4 r4 r4 tamb8 tamb8"
>
> No, it would be tamb4 r4 tamb4 tamb8 tamb8 .  Rests have never had any
> form of implicit notation.  Saving a single letter is just not worth 
> it.

Sorry, I typed too quickly.  I meant tamb4 not r4.  So it would work 
like any other bare duration.


-- Aaron Hill