[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit default duration?
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit default duration? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:45:03 -0500 |
On Jan 23, 2023, at 10:11, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> I am not saying that 0 is the best choice here. It merely appears to be
> rather cheap. I thought of * and / but the first renders sequences like
> c4*2 ambiguous and the second would at least become a mess in chord
> mode.
Can you clarify how `c4*2` would be ambiguous? (I was about to suggest `r*1`
for your original example.)
—
Dan
- Re: Explicit default duration?, (continued)
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, Luca Fascione, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, Aaron Hill, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, Dan Eble, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/26
- Re: Explicit default duration?,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/23
- Re: Explicit default duration?, Dan Eble, 2023/01/23
- Re: Explicit default duration?, David Kastrup, 2023/01/23
Re: Explicit default duration?, Benkő Pál, 2023/01/23