[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updating GNU Guix's package definition for LilyPond
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Updating GNU Guix's package definition for LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:13:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
> Hi Jahrme,
>
> Le 17/01/2023 à 12:14, Jahrme Risner a écrit :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently moved my primary system onto GNU Guix and have been
>> getting it set up according. While doing that I noticed that the
>> Guix package for LilyPond is still on 2.20.0, seemingly having
>> missed the entire 2.22.0 release cycle,
>
>
>
> Given that one of LilyPond's creators now works on Guix, I actually find
> this a bit surprising...
Jan? Well, he'd not likely be in a rush to update, given that LilyPond
worked fine for him for decades.
Anekdote: two(?) years ago I was in a LilyPond-centric conference in
Salzburg and put something like
\override Staff.KeySignature.color = #red
on a slide. Han-Wen discretely took me aside and told me that I had
misspelt what should be
\override Staff.KeySignature color = #red
That seriously threw me for a loop since that syntax change had been
done (backward-compatibly) in 2012 or so, and my whole manner of
thinking about that line did not match Han-Wen's. Of course I literally
knew where he was coming from, and it was a place he was comfortable
with.
It felt sort of seeing someone enter a house through a tunnel trapdoor
that had not been used as such for a decade because there was a much
more convenient entrance by now.
--
David Kastrup