Re: Turkish makam

[Hans Åberg]

> On 14 Jan 2023, at 08:06, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>>> Too bad that `makam.ly` is essentially undocumented...
>> 
>> From what I can see, makam.ly is the original faulty file, only
>> there for backwards compatibility, which might be removed if there
>> is no need for that.
> 
> We could make it become deprecated in the next release, to be
> completely removed in the release after.

If there are no compatibility issues, perhaps turkish-makam.ly 
<http://turkish-makam.ly/> might be renamed makam.ly <http://makam.ly/>. Adam 
Good might give his view.