[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:28:29 +0000 (UTC) |
>> What concerns me most is the non-portability of locale names, for
>> example 'fr_FR', 'fr.UTF-8', 'fr_FR.utf8', 'fr_FR.UTF-8', or
>> 'French_France.65001'.
>
> I thought locales were already standardised ...
>
> languagecode underscore countrycode dot characterset
This is the theory, yes. But as my previous links to 'perllocale' and
gnulib's `locale-fr.m4` show, it is not.
> The only really odd one in that list you gave seems to me to be
> French_France.
This is native Microsoft (according to `locale-fr.m4`).
Werner
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, (continued)
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation,Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Wol, 2022/11/29
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/30
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/28
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Hans Ã…berg, 2022/11/23
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21