[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:40:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:06 PM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> The thing is: Something might happen if I'm not available, for
>> whatever reasons. It definitely *is* a high maintenance cost if a
>> single developer is responsible...
>>
>
> But that's true of any one feature: I build you a nice template library to
> do <whatever> in <whatever situation>
> and you find a bug while I'm <on vacation>. That can always happen, we know
> this, we cope with it.
> How's the TeX/texinfo build any different?
LuaTeX is not in "bugfixes only" mode. The other TeX engines are, if
even that.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, (continued)
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, David Kastrup, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/22
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21