[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations
From: |
Luca Fascione |
Subject: |
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:26:59 +0200 |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
> > Le 20/10/2022 12:59 CEST, Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > I think having GPL content in the lsr is the least desirable in the long
> term, because either folks using it won't notice, or they might find
> themselves unable or unwilling to use GPL as part of their content.
>
This came out too strong. I meant "there is a possibility/risk that folks
might"
L
--
Luca Fascione
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, (continued)
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/20
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Luca Fascione, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21
- Re: Potential LSR licensing violations,
Luca Fascione <=
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Thomas Morley, 2022/10/20
Re: Potential LSR licensing violations, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/10/21