Re: '#:optional' in Scheme function documentation looks weird

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> A quick work-around is to use Guile 2.x, as Jean has reported in
>> !808...
> 
> Is that actually better?  Last time I had contact with Guile-2.x in
> that respect, it replaced the argument lists by generic a b c d .
> That would be different here?

I don't know.  I have always used 1.x; I have zero experience with
2.x.  Of course, I would prefer a solution that works with 1.x, too –
but if the problem vanishes with 2.x, no such changes are necessary.

> I'll take a look at what's happening here.

Thanks!


    Werner